Friday, October 12, 2007


Love, Money, Honesty & Trading

SOMETHING FOR THE HOLIDAYS. THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG'S LIST. POSTING THE WHOLE THREAD AS I GOT IT IN AN EMAIL. OBVIOUSLY A PRAGMATIC WOMAN IN NEW YORK.

What am I doing wrong? Okay, I'm tired of beating around the bush. I'm a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I'm articulate and classy. I'm not from New York. I'm looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don't think I'm overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 - 250. But that's where I seem to hit a road block. 250,000 won't get me to Central Park West. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she's not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics - bars, restaurants, gyms

- What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won't hurt my feelings

- Is there an age range I should be targeting (I'm 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I've seen really 'plain jane' boring types who have nothing to offer, married to incredibly wealthy guys. I've seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What's the story there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY.

Please hold your insults - I'm putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I'm being up front about it. I wouldn't be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn't able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth. It's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


THE ANSWER Dear Pers-431649184:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I see it.Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simply a crappy business deal. Here's why.

Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won'tbe getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease.

In case you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful" as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation. With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way. Classic "pump and dump." I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.
(Last edit: 2007-10-04 02:40:51)


Next Best Thing: CNOOC


Seeing the performances of BOC, Petrochina and Shenhua is like getting the top 3 prized in 4D. Readers who have positions in them can do what they like: trade, take profit or just take the winnings and run. Its frothy both in Shanghai and HK. Bulls roam the streets. Picking the right China covered warrant is not difficult, just do a bit of homework. BOC 's recent quarterly earnings were splendid, and you can easily see that analysts will be clamouring to upgrade their price targets. As for Shenhua, the H-share discount, the A-share listing, the inclusion into important indices, the status as top in their industry - are all requisite factors sustaining its uptrend. May best bet from day one, Petrochina, should do even better than Shenhua.

What about the rest? Are there any other picks? Well, the selection process is quite straight forward. First, pick those WITHOUT an A-share listing. That would cut out a lot of them. Those without a Shanghai listing are just a few steps behind Shenhua and Petrochina. Spurts of buying activity will be triggered on announcement of a plan to do an A-share listing. Another spurt will follow on company's and Beijing's approval. Then another spurt will arrive when an actual date of listing is set.

Secondly, if its not an industry leader, it might be best to sell just before their Shanghai debut as the H-share will dip following the Shanghai listing. However, if they are market leaders in their industry or have a near monopolistic hold like Petrochina, then the uptrend will be greater all along the path and even after the listing. Shenhua was a fine candidate. Petrochina is my akin to my pet. The next best thing ...

CNOOC,the Hong Kong-listed arm of China National Offshore Oil Corp. CNOOC is among the large-cap Chinese oil majors, a big plus point. It is a purely upstream company, thus it has the highest oil price leverage among peers - a fact which should PERK UP INVESTORS at a time of high oil prices. CNOOC's shares have even outperformed Petrochina and Sinopec based on the leverage factor alone.

CNOOC has one of the best production growth outlooks, at an average of 15%-17% between 2007 and 2009, among global integrated oil producers. The high growth rate should be sustained beyond 2009 because of recent discoveries such as Egina in Nigeria and Jinzhou 25-1, offshore China.

Ah, yes, the company has also gotten approval for an A-share listing recently. Owing to its high correlation to the price of oil, one can trade the covered warrants just based on the fluctuations of oil prices as a guide. The LH11-1 Liuhua oilfield now back in production mode has caused many analysts to upgrade their near term and long term production figures.

CNOOC could see a production compound average growth rate(CAGR) of between 11%-22% between 2006 and 2010.

CNOOC-C1

almost zero premium

gearing at just 3.5x, not terribly exciting but its decent

maturity 25 february 2008

anything below 0.40 would be a good entry level

Thursday, October 11, 2007




Selamat Hari Raya, Fellow Readers, drive safely...

UBS New Target Price For Shenhua HK$101!!!

I thought I was bullish, but was forwarded the latest piece of research from UBS dated today. Mind you, Shenhua's high price today was around HK$52.00 ... so the target price can make or break careers! Added to that, Shenhua will be added to all the indices for Shanghai from October 23.

Here's the summary:

UBS Investment Research

China Shenhua Energy Coal

12-month rating Buy Unchanged

12m price target HK$101.00/US$12.92

Macro reality, raising PT to HK$101

• Moving beyond conventional valuation According to our estimates, Shenhua’s current share price is already reflecting the stock at 33x 2008E on up-cycle earnings, the DCF is pricing in acquisitions and operations at a long-term coal price of US$70/t, 3% less than the all-time high regional spot price. We believe a suitable approach is to try to look at the positive macro coal price environment and try to quantify the valuation upside.

• No historical precedent for macroenvironment The challenge for coal equity valuations is that the China coal pricing environment does not have a historical precedent—China becomes a net importer and there was very little coal price weakness in Q3. We believe the key issue is the valuation of China’s largest coal company if there is a coal shortage.

• What is the right price: using A-share comparables We think a relevant measure is the amount domestic investors would be willing to pay and we use a 15% premium to the highest domestic coal stock’s PE. If we run earnings at spot coal prices, our 2008E scenario PE at our price target is 45x. The implicit long-term coal price at our price target is US$150/t. At current natural gas prices the equivalent coal price is US$130/t.

• Valuation: raising our PT from HK$35.15 to HK$101 We base our price target on a 15% premium to the highest traded domestic coal stock at a target multiple of 74x.

Picking China Stocks By Investing Legends

Was alerted to the insightful and timely article by Windsurfer. This was in the latest issue of Forbes, written by John Reese, who smartly deduced investing legends' investment parameters to come up with stock picks. Below are excerpts from the article on what stocks would O'Neil or Lynch would have picked. His book is worth picking up just to learn what the legends look for and how their minds work, and why.

........... there are a handful of Chinese stocks that appear to be on strong fundamental footing. These are companies that haven't just gotten swept up in the excitement over Chinese stocks; they've also positioned themselves well for continued long-term growth.

Here's a look at some of these top performers.

Petrochina Company Limited: Formed as part of the restructuring of China National Petroleum Corporation in 1999, Petrochina is one of the largest companies in China, with a market cap of almost US$340 billion and annual sales of more than US$100 billion. The Beijing-based business is involved in crude oil and natural gas exploration, transportation, storage and marketing, as well as the production and sale of chemical products and the transmission and sale of natural gas.

Petrochina gets high marks from two of my guru-based models, those that I base on the strategies of Peter Lynch and James O'Shaughnessy. My Lynch-based strategy considers the company a "fast-grower" because of its 24.45% growth rate (based on the average of the three-, four-, and five-year earnings per share figures) --Lynch's favorite type of investment.

For Lynch, the most important variable when looking at stocks was the price-to-earnings-growth ratio, which identifies growth stocks that are selling at a good price by dividing a stock's price-to-earnings ratio by its growth rate. P/E/G ratios below 1.0 are acceptable to my Lynch-based model, with those under 0.5 the best case. When we take Petrochina's P/E (17.69) and divide it by that 24.45% growth rate, we get a P/E/G ratio of 0.72. That's good enough to pass my Lynch-based model's most important test, indicating that this fast-grower is still a good buy.

Lynch also liked stocks that were conservatively financed, and the model I base on his writings calls for stocks to have debt that is no greater than 80% of their equity. Petrochina's debt/equity ratio is 10.99%, passing the test.

While my Lynch-based model considers it a fast-grower, Petrochina also appeals to my O'Shaughnessy-based value strategy. When looking for value stocks, O'Shaughnessy targets large companies because they have solid and stable earnings, so the strategy I base on his writings requires stocks to have a market cap of at least US$1 billion. With that giant US$340 billion cap, Petrochina is one of the biggest companies in the world, easily meeting this criterion.

O'Shaughnessy also compares stocks to the market average in a number of ways when looking for value buys, including cash flow per share. My O'Shaughnessy-based model requires companies to have a cash flow per share greater than the market mean, and Petrochina's cash flow, at US$15.77 per share, dwarfs the market mean of US$1.53.

Another way O'Shaughnessy looks for large, stable companies: by requiring a firm's trailing 12-month sales to be 1.5 times the market average. Petrochina, with sales of more than $100 billion, easily exceeds 1.5 times the market mean ($18 billion), passing this test.

Aluminum Corp. of China Limited (Chalco): This large-cap (US$34 billion market cap) is the only producer of alumina and the largest producer of primary aluminum in China. The public company was formed six years ago when--as was the case with Petrochina--its formerly state-owned industry was restructured. Last year, it raked in more than US$8.2 billion in sales.

CHALCO, as it is called, is another fast-grower that gets approval from my Lynch-based model. Its P/E ratio of 21.57 and growth rate of 46.4% (based on the average of the three-, four-, and five-year EPS figures) make for an impressive 0.46 P/E/G ratio, which falls into this model's best-case category. You shouldn't expect such high growth to continue over the long term, but the firm should be in good shape if it grows earnings at even half that rate.

CHALCO's debt/equity ratio, 42.01 also appears to be manageable, another reason it gets high marks from my Lynch-based model.

Shanda Interactive Entertainment Ltd.: This Shanghai-based firm offers an array of online entertainment content, ranging from multi-player role playing games to online chess and board games to cartoons, movies and online shopping. It has a market cap of $2.68 billion, and its sales have increased in each of the past five quarters.

With a P/E ratio of 16.40 and a growth rate of 23.5% (based on the average of the three- and four-year EPS figures), Shanda is a fast-grower that sports a favorable 0.70 P/E/G ratio. While the company has been growing quickly, its stock appears to still be selling at a good price.

Shanda's debt/equity ratio--68.37%--isn't great. But it's good enough to come in under my Lynch-based model's 80% upper limit, another reason it passes this strategy.

A testament to Shanda's excellent recent performance is that, in addition to appealing to my Lynch model, it also passes the momentum strategy I base on the writings of William O'Neil. O'Neil says cheap stocks are cheap for good reason: They don't perform well. He believes that--while you'll likely pay top dollar for them-- the most likely candidates for future growth are companies that have had strong past growth. Buy low, and you won't get the chance to sell high, according to his approach; buy high, however, and you'll likely get the chance to sell even higher.

One way O'Neil targets momentum stocks is by looking at recent EPS growth. He likes EPS for the current quarter to be at least 18% greater than it was in the same quarter a year ago. Shanda's EPS this quarter is 217% greater than the year-ago quarter, easily passing this test.

O'Neil doesn't just like earnings to be increasing; he likes the rate of that increase to be accelerating. The model I base on his writings likes it when a company's growth rates for the last two quarters (compared to the same respective quarters a year earlier) are at least 25 percentage points more than the firm's historical growth rate. Shanda's 23.5% historical growth rate is good, but it was dwarfed by the 4,000 percent growth rate it experienced between last quarter and the year-ago quarter, and by the 216.7% jump between this quarter and the year-ago quarter, passing this test.

As I said, O'Neil is a believer in "buy high, sell higher," so he also looks at relative strength, which compares a stock's price performance to the overall market over the past year. My O'Neil-based model looks for relative strength ratings of no less than 80 (meaning that the stock has outperformed at least 80% of all other stocks during the past year). Shanda's relative strength is 95, which this model considers exceptional.

China Medical Technologies: Based in Beijing, this medical device maker manufactures and sells diagnostic products that are used to detect and monitor various diseases and disorders. The firm also makes "High Intensity Focused Ultrasound" products, which treat solid cancers and benign tumors non-invasively. It has a market cap of $1.18 billion.

China Medical gets approval from the strategy I base on the writings of Martin Zweig, in large part because of its strong growth. The company's historical growth rate, 49.09% (based on the average of the three- and four-year EPS figures), more than triples my Zweig-based model's 15% minimum. (Just as was the case with CHALCO, you shouldn't expect the company to keep growing at such a high rate over the long haul. But even if it continues to grow at half its historic pace it would still easily meet this criterion.)

Zweig also wants to know that a company hasn't already reached the peak of its earnings growth. The model I base on his writings calls for a firm's EPS growth in the current quarter to be greater than its historical growth rate. China Medical's growth rate for the current quarter is 50%, which tops that 49.09% historic growth rate, passing this test.

Zweig also believed that, to be sustainable in the long-term, earnings increases should be fueled by increases in sales. China Medical's revenues have been growing at a 70.27% clip, surpassing its earnings increases and passing this test.

China Medical also gets approval from my O'Neil-based strategy. A few reasons why: Its relative strength of 90, its 49.09 historical growth rate, and its 50% growth rate for the current quarter.

Another plus for China Medical: its industry. O'Neil liked firms that were in strong industries, so this model makes sure that at least one other company in a firm's industry has a relative strength score of at least 80. The booming medical equipment and supplies industry has 59 companies meeting or exceeding that threshold.

Baidu.com: This Internet search engine is something like China's answer to the Western world's Google. Its offerings include Internet, image and news searches; a message board user communication program called "Post Bar"; a movie download program; and a system that allows users to ask questions that are answered by other users. The search engine even allows users to enter Chinese words phonetically using the English alphabet.

Baidu, which has a market cap of $10.9 billion, is another momentum pick that my O'Neil-based model likes. Its EPS growth for the current quarter is 150% (compared to the same quarter a year ago), and its annual earnings growth is 160.8% (based on the average of the two- and five-year EPS figures). That shows the kind of impressive recent growth that this strategy looks for.

In addition, Baidu has outperformed the vast majority of other stocks over the past year, as its relative strength rating of 97 demonstrates.

As the success of companies like Baidu shows, emerging markets--particularly one as large as China--can offer incredible growth opportunities. In recent years, we've seen stock prices skyrocket not only for U.S.-listed Chinese companies, but also for their Indian and Latin American counterparts. Sometimes, however, such tremendous potential can be dangerous, luring investors into thinking that any stock in a hot, emerging market is a sure thing. Momentum is great, but in the long run there has to be something concrete behind that momentum for a stock to keep growing.

Sure, some of the stocks that I've mentioned may have trouble continuing their staggering recent growth rates, and a developing market like China could indeed experience some growing pains and setbacks for investors. But each of these companies has fundamentals--be they high earnings, strong sales or manageable debt--that indicate they're more than flashes in the pan. Stick to stocks with that kind of fundamental strength, and your portfolio should benefit--no matter what country you're looking at.

John P. Reese is founder and CEO of Validea.com and Validea Capital Management. He is also co-author of "The Market Gurus: Stock Investing Strategies You Can Use From Wall Street's Best."

Wednesday, October 10, 2007


UBS Analyst In New York Resigned In Style

The resignation email

I'm leaving the bank now.

I'm not made to do this. If I put my mind to something as much as I do here to mindless text editing, copy and pasting, and getting yelled at for stuff other people can't/won't/don't do, I would be much better off.

It's 6:43 a.m. on a Sunday, and I have at least 14 more hours of work to do today that will not be fulfilling, useful, appreciated, recognized, or paid for.

Sorry this is last minute, but it's just not worth doing more

My blackberry is on my desk

Apparently that failed staffing request was fatal (no, not as in I'm going to kill myself, hehe, I'm just going to go enjoy life). There is no happiness here.

I took all my personal stuff. No one needs to contact me for anything (except for a drink for those of you with my personal number). I will only be at my New York address a few days longer.

Good luck y'all

The analyst was part of UBS's US global healthcare group, sent an email to his bosses at 7am last Sunday, informing them he was leaving the bank immediately to go do something less boring instead. The final straw appears to be the fact that it was Sunday morning and he had another 14 hours of work to do that day that would "not be fulfilling, useful, appreciated, recognized or paid for".

It looks like a 2-4 year old analyst having an early mid-life-crisis. Yes, these jobs are largely mind numbing, and you work for extended hours, but who will pay you 80,000 euros or US$150,000 a year when you are still in your mid twenties? Plus you are likely to get bonuses of 6-12 months of your pay depending on the markets. The ex-UBS analyst may have higher ideals and priorities in life, but at the same time is naive about investment banking. Just like many things in life, the reality sucks - e.g. you want to be a medical doctor, but after you studied like a dumb-bell for 5-6 years, you find yourself in the midst of all things gory and gross. But the reason you went into medicine was you wanted to save lives, nobody told you about the gory and gross stuff? That's too bad. Grow up!


Global Market Share Of Financial Markets

Came across this really useful summary on the relative market share for each of the top global exchanges. The figures are for 2006 or the latest available figures. Bursa does not figure even in the top 28 in all categories, we are really small OK.

Equity Turnover

1) US: 49%

2) UK: 11%

3) Japan: 8.3%

4) Germany: 3.9%

5) France: 2.8%

6) Spain: 2.8%

7) Korea: 1.9%

others - Singapore: 0.3%; HK: 1.2%; Australia: 1.2%; Shanghai: 1.1%

Comments: There is a long way to go before its the Asian era. Sure, Asia is making deep inroads economically but its not a 3 year or 5 year thing. Its more like a 20 or 30 year change of tide. It will be unfair to criticise Bursa's turnover as we rely only on locally listed companies - an interesting fact, on certain trading days, the turnover value of just ONE South Korea stock (Samsung) is more than the value turnover of the entire Bursa!

Funds Raised Through IPO

1) UK: 16.9%

2) US: 16.3%

3) HK: 12.9%

4) Spain: 4.5%

5)Norway: 4.2%

Others - Singapore: 1.5%; Australia: 3.9%; Shanghai: 3.6%

Comments: Thanks to the huge H-shares listings, HK performed very well. That in itself is a huge boost to the vibrancy and revival of HK's financial markets. The preference for A-share listing by Beijing may slow things somewhat in 2008 and 2009 for HK. UK topped the US thanks to the aggressive and cowboy-town of AIM, and the overly-zealous Sarbanes-Oxley rules/guidelines. Can expect SOX to be watered down very soon. Singapore performed exceptionally well in attracting decent foreign companies and REITs to list on SGX.

FX Turnover

1) UK: 31.3%

2) US: 19.2%

3) Japan: 8.3%

4) Singapore: 5.2%

5) Germany: 4.9%

6) HK: 4.2%

Comments: UK maintained its dominance in forex as it straddles the crucial timezones for Asian / Europe / before passing the books to US. Singapore's strength shines through in forex despite having to compete in the same timezone as HK and Japan. SGX could parlay this advantage even better by linking up more with Chicago Merc.

Asia Scorecard: HK still in front as Asia's financial center even though Singapore has made good progress over the last 5 years. HK's financial future boosted by its ties with mainland China companies, and will be a crucial channel and conduit for them in the future. Even as the smog encapsulates HK, it is likely that its status as the Asian financial center will expand in importance in the coming years. The new fangled mini-financial supermarts in Dubai and Abu Dhabi will fill their niches, but won't be making much of a dot on the global stage for a very long time to come.

Tuesday, October 09, 2007


Organ Donation 101

We need not reinvent the wheel here. Just follow global best practices. Its good that the media has brought up recent cases of successful and unsuccessful organ transplants. The high visibility should be followed through with concrete steps.

1) As per Chua Soi Lek's statements, the government must make the necessary amendments to the Human Tissue Act and Medical Act to ensure family members cannot object to an organ donor's pledge.

2) The most effective way is registering with National Transplant Resource Center (03-2694-2704)


3) Make all driving licenses to have a declaration for wanting to be an organ donor, clearly PRINTED on their licenses. It makes for immediate identification by police, doctors, ambulance drivers, nurses and other relevant parties. All organ pledgers data registered via the Malaysian driving license would immediately be shared and linked to the National Transplant Resource Center's database. Donors who wished to change their pledge will have to have new licenses, failing to do that will mean all pledges will be honoured by the donor as per the existing driving license.

4) Other people especially non-drivers will have to be contacted and engaged via other means.

In Australia, the NSW state has me as Donor A, which is clearly printed on my driving license, which indicates that I am OK with donating all my organs. There are other options as well if you choose to donate only certain organs (save my dick, save my dick... I can hear some yelling to their graves!!!). Doing it via driving licenses is very effective.

As insensitive as this may sound, every Hari Raya ops or Chinese New Year ops will see hundreds of deaths - if even half were registered organ donors, we could make something "good" to come out from these tragedies. Its a bizarre and sickening thought , but its the reality - I don't think we can stop road accidents (we can only try to lessen them) esp during these congested days, so let's try to make something "good" come out of them.

Successful organ and tissue donation has meant the possibility of life and health to many people in our community. Organ transplants are only possible when people generously decide that in the event of their death they would like to donate their organs to help others.
Australia - Australian Health Ministers, supported by the Australian Transport Council, reached agreement to set up a nationally based accessible information system that identifies people willing to be organ donors on their driver licences. Consequently, the Road Transport Authority is trialing a scheme where it transfers details of its organ donor data to the Health Insurance Commission to form part of the Australian Organ Donor Register. In the meantime the RTA, HIC and Lifelink in NSW are working together to reach an agreement on the future of the current arrangements. All Australian States are participating in the arrangement. The ACT and the Northern Territory are not involved because they do not have donor data recorded on driver licences.

Greenspan & The Daily Show

One of the top comedy slots, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, had a coup of sorts when they got Alan Greenspan on the show. The funny and intelligent Stewart basically got two major points in: one, central banks favour risk takers rather than savers; and two, we are not in a free market economy, never was, never will be.


http://www.comedycentral.com/motherload/index.jhtml?ml_video=102970

p/s you gotta wait about 20 seconds for it to load properly

Sunday, October 07, 2007



Petrochina & Shenhua To Sizzle Even More

Both had notched good gains over the last few weeks on news that they are next in line for a Shanghai listing. A factor which many have missed recently was the performance of the China Oilfield Services,
which tripled in their Shanghai debut, far exceeding even analysts' bullish expectations as investors eyed its near monopoly position in a high-growth sector of the world's second largest energy market.

Generally, the H-shares which is going for a Shanghai listing will see their Shanghai IPO priced at a slight discount to the H-shares, hence the tripling on listing will exaggerate the A-share premium even more, causing the H-shares to rise further to narrow the gap.
Not all H-shares going for listing to Shanghai perform equally. The China Construction Bank experience recently was a good example. Shares in China Construction Bank rose by a less-than-expected 32 per cent on their first day of trading on the Shanghai market. Seems like mainland investors are not acting like madmen or are hunting as packs of wolves. They do differentiate. Although such a share price increase would be considered large in many markets, it is well below the first-day jump enjoyed by several other Chinese companies in recent months. The CCB's experience was compared to other H-shares bank listings such as China Citic Bank, Bank of Nanjing and Bank of Communications - all nearly doubled on their first day of trading in Shanghai.

There were two things working against CCB, its not that unique as there are plenty banks listed in Shanghai already, and arguably CCB is not the best managed one anyway. Two, it was the largest flotation as CCB raised Rmb58bn (US$7.7bn) from the Shanghai listing. Good is good, but to propel the largest ever listing to double would have required an avalanche of a whole load of fresh investors funds on listing day to soak up the profit takers.

The record for the largest initial public offering will be broken with Shenhua Energy, China’s largest coal-miner, which will raise as much as Rmb66.6bn from the upcoming listing. As the largest in its industry, Shenhua should do a lot better than CCB. Investors seem to be according higher premiums to industry leaders or companies with a near monopolistic hold on their industry. Shenhua fits the bill. PetroChina fits the bill even more. China Oilfield almost monopolises the rapidly growing domestic offshore oil drilling and services sector, Shenhua is the same, while Petrochina is an even bigger force than China Oilfield.

The recent weakness on bouts of selling by Warren Buffett in Petrochina should not deter investors from buying the H-shares. As explained many times before in this blog, Buffett has a significant stake of around 10% in Petrochina and has made a killing many times over on the investment. If one were to go through the minutes of his last AGM for Berkshire Hathaway, there were a lot of questions, concerns and calls to sell off Petrochina owing to the company's "participation" in Darfur. I see the selling down of the stake as moves to pacify the shareholders - the last thing Buffett wants is to be accused of NOT listening to shareholders on what they want the company to stand for in terms of corporate governance, integrity and moral compass issues. The other thing is that it will be very difficult to sell all Petrochina over a short period of time owing to the size of the stake. I believe Buffett wants to have his cake and eat it by selling in small bouts thus pacifying shareholders, and this prolongs his ability to hold onto the rest of Petrochina for an extended period, thus boosting returns. All said, Buffett and Berkshire will be on their way out of the company, probably after 2 more years, but that is not a bad thing necessarily as Berkshire is forced to sell on issues which are non-financial in nature.

Hence I expect Shenhua to perform close to China Oilfield, but probably not as well. The shares should at least double, which will move the H-shares up nicely to bring the gap to 40%-50%. As for Petrochina, there is a very good chance that we may see a performance outstripping that of China Oilfield despite the size of Petrochina's offering. After all, there is only one Petrochina, and its probably the next best big cap stock to hold in China after China Mobile.

As if that was not enough to boost Shenhua and Petrochina prospects in the near term. The HK Exchange has come in to pour gasoline on the flames of optimism. In a move to reflect the importance of mainland companies in Hong Kong's capital market, PetroChina and Shenhua are expected to become Hang Seng Index constituent stocks on December 10 following the HSI's quarterly review next month.

HSI Services, which compiles the benchmark index, completed its reshuffle last month by capping large stocks such as HSBC Holdings and China Mobile at 15 percent market float in order to include more H shares, reflecting the growing prominence of Chinese firms. After adding the 10 mainland-linked stocks, Hou said the HSI would develop more of the China character favored by global investors. The inclusion of both giants will cause a big surge in demand for their H-shares for indexing purposes.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007








The China Fairy Tale

Will the Shanghai index reach 10,000 by end 2008? Will China be the #1 global economic power by 2010? Will the yuan reach 6.8 against the USD prior to the Olympics? The answer to all three has a high YES probability. I used to whack Chinese stock markets as being bubblish, however, I now think it has more upside to go before correcting. Yes the markets there are expensive but super bull runs do result in a over extended valuations.

Global investors usually see China through 3 things only:

a) China's sizzling trade surplus

b) the yuan's appreciation
c) the Shanghai stock market barometer

This gives all a blinkered view of what's really happening in China, and the consequences of their growth, might and power.

The stock markets in China, even if it lost 50% in value overnight won't stop the real economy posting 9%-11% growth pa.a. for the next 3 years minimum. Now, this is after growing on average of 10%p.a. since the 80s. The compounded growth rates have basically reach a stage where China's economy is already right up there in the top few. Any further growth spurts will put them firmly on track to be #1 within the next few years.

China stock markets are only a small percentage of GDP. Even at current lofty levels, the market value of all mainland stock markets adds up to less than 38% of China's GDP. That percentage is an indicator of how much of your GDP is listed. Malaysia has one of the highest ratio in the world, above 80% of GDP is listed. Just look around, the only things left unlisted are the kopi tiams, mamak stalls and laundry shops. If your business starts to make RM1m-RM3m a year, you have evryone pounding on your door to get you listed, by hook or crook. In the US, the figure is skewed at 180% of GDP because a lot of listings are foreign companies. But if its just US assets, the figure is even lower than Malaysia's. The higher the ratio, the higher the "beta" due to bull/bear rallies. Hence the Malaysian economy gets a strong multiplier effect during bull runs, and vice versa. On the same not, we can surmise that the impact on China's economic engine will be very limited, either way, by their stock markets.

There is also another fear that China relies heavily on exports to grow, and the current recessionary factors in pockets of the US economy may cause damage to Chinese exports. Plus the recent trade sanctions against China exports will hurt China's growth engine. That is a big fallacy, China's growth relies more on its domestic economy than exports. Chinese exports only make up 40% of China's GDP. If last year's export growth was flat, the Chinese economy would still be putting up annual growth rates of between 8%-9%p.a., not too shabby.

Another factor is that more than 60% of Chinese exports are actually foreign companies operating in China and re-exporting back to US and EU. So, if there is a slowdown on the demand side, the Chinese import side would also see a near corresponding slide (importation of materials and related items necessary for production). US is also becoming a less important destination for exports - over the last 12 months, exports to US grew just above the 10% level year-on-year, but exports to the EU grew nearly 50% over the same period. The US has to be careful as US exports to China & HK totaled US$73bn in 2006, and that is the 3rd biggest export market for the US. Any further bullying tactics by US lawmakers can backfire with dire consequences.

Rising prices in oil, gas and other commodities necessary for production are thought to be hurting China's manufacturing prowess. The truth is, China is the capital for global manufacturing, and the main reason for the jumps in prices for most commodities is the China factor. However, the relative cost savings and productivity gains by operating in China outstrips the price increase in commodities, oil or gas. Even with labour wages rising double-digits p.a. for the past 10 years, the relative gains in productivity and unit labour cost still makes China very competitive. By being a production capital for global companies, it created a lot of jobs, and hence improved the per capita income steadily in China as well. This in turn fans the domestic economy, which is a big plus for any foreign company operating or manufacturing out of China. Even if labour wages rises 15%p.a. for the next 5 years and fuel reaches US$100 per barrel, manufacturing out of China will still be very cost effective.

Beijing will allow the stock markets to crash after the Olympics - that's the coffee-shop talk. There are usually lull periods after the build up period leading to the Olympics, so softer market conditions in all areas are to be expected. Whether they will have a big market correction after the Olympics depends a lot on where the indices are then. Olympics is but one event, are we saying that Beijing will STOP all projects after Olympics? However, Beijing also realises that you cannot have a stock market that is always on a rise. And there are good reasons to "allow" the market to find its feet after the Olympics. Judging by the level of concern from Beijing whenever the markets goes into a mini correction, makes me think that there is more to the coffee-shop thesis. The way they have massaged the markets, Beijing really don't want a big correction, but it also knows it doesn't want a very very strong bull run to run out of hand. Hence the QDIIs and the asking of H-share companies to relist in Shanghai, and the plans to allow individuals to invest directly in HK listed shares. All are valves created to lessen the liquidity swishing in the system. Hence, it does look like uptrend is secured right up till Olympics, and you can say the same for the property side as well. After that, who knows!

The yuan will be a reflection of China's economic power. The US harping on China to revalue the yuan is a wrong tactic. If you get the yuan to appreciate 25% overnight, all it does is to shift some of the big-ticket items to a another place/nation where its cheaper to produce, and it won't be USA. Just the location of production changes.
Why Beijing is slow to appreciate the yuan? Mainly they know that there are still a lot of "shit" within the Chinese economic and financial systems. On the economic front, many areas of the economy still have tax credits and tax breaks on many imported items. Their financial system is still very immature, and the huge amount of bad debts in most Chinese banks needs to be worked down. Part of the reason why the bigger banks have been allowed to have foreign shareholders (usually banks only) is to tap on their expertise to work down the bad debts. A very large cancerous spot in their economic system is the inefficient state enterprises. The good ones are manned by very good people and they get listed easily. For every Petrochina there are literally hundreds of debt ladened state companies. Hence Beijing is buying time for the "shit" to be minimised while the going is good.
The other point being, if you just harp on the yuan as a deliberately under-valued tool to load up on the trade surplus - that's a myopic view. The yuan is but a small tool in explaining why MNCs choose to operate in China. Cost is one small thing, their huge domestic economy is a big factor, and the concentration of similar suppliers brings about economies of scale. A study showed that a 25% revaluation in the yuan would wipe only US$20bn from the US$800bn trade deficit (2006) after 2 years.

Hence, the China fairy tale is unlike the Cinderellas or Snow Whites of the world, this one will come true. This China fairy tale is NOT a fairy tale. To those who think that China will implode horribly after a few more years, they are likely to be very wrong. We all must think, behave and plan as if China will be the #1 global economic powerhouse, even now, because that is not a possibility but a certainty.






Tuesday, October 02, 2007


S-Shares & H-Shares

cheeping said...

Hi,

On last Thurs, it is reported in Singapore that a 3rd QDII fund has been approved in China. This fund is special in the sense that it caninvest in China companies listed outside China/HK: i.e. Singapore and US. Due to this, S-shares has risen tremendously on Friday and Monday due to their relatively cheap valuations, even against H-shares.

What is your take on this new development? Wouldn't teh S shares being more undervalued has more attractiveness?

sopskysalat said...

There is a spillover effect to drive the forgotten S-shares.

A>H>S Thus, the theme is turning its direction into the Singapore market creating a phenomenon among the S-shares.

Yes, there is a new approved fund to invest into S-Shares, China shares listed in Singapore. However, S-Shares are not H-Shares. Given a choice the classier and bigger ones list on HKSE while the smaller specky ones list in Singapore. The one big drawback of S-Shares, they will probably NOT be asked to go relist back into Shanghai or Shenzen anytime soon. The third QDII is good news but the focus of capital onto S-Shares will peter out quickly for many reasons.

The attraction in H-shares are: the discount gap; these are superior companies in terms of market size and corporate management; these are always among the top 100 companies of all China; these are the companies asked to come back to relist in Shanghai to satisfy demand for their shares; due to the size, they are highly attractive to big international funds due to their size and liquidity; they are considered as the next best exposure to an indirect play into China; many international funds investing into Greater China (HK, China and Taiwan) are based in HK for obvious reasons; etc.
While the news is good for S-shares, its not mind blowing.

Monday, October 01, 2007


HK's Hang Seng Exuberance

The Hang Seng index coupled with the H-share index have been outperforming every other Asian markets for the past 6 months. Much of it can be attributed to the spillover effects from the Shanghai and Shenzen bourses. However, the real factors behind HK's sizzling market performance go deeper than that. Let's start with the China factor. Many HK companies are an indirect play into China, but without the lofty valuations of stocks in Shanghai or Shenzen. The closed up China markets to foreign investors have brought a huge group of investors and fund managers to HK, hoping to get a slice of the action by buying HK shares with business exposure in China and the ridiculously discounted H-shares.

Many are wising up to the fact that H-shares discount will eventually narrow substantially. The A-share price have traded at 40%-60% premium to H-shares with no sound fundamental reasons except demand is higher in the mainland. If the status quo stays forever, then the discount is warranted. But H-shares are being "asked" to also list in Shanghai in order to help satisfy the demand for good shares back in the mainland. The other thing is H-shares are necessarily "better shares" already by virtue of passing the hurdles set by HK Exchange. They are much bigger, better visibility and have a good record in corporate governance and transparency. The H-share factor brings in long term players who are willing to ride the boom and see the discount being worked down eventually.

The H-shares have also provided a huge boom in the related warrants trading. Warrants trading in HK, mainly driven by H-shares, are in the top 3 in the world. Watch how the money trickle down. It used to be that HK only makes money 3 ways: tourism, property and stocks. Now it also acts as a conduit to China, a strong supply-chain consultant to China, a huge capital center to tap for investing into China, and in more ways are complementing each other's economic model rather than competing with one another. The huge jumps in China's income per capita have prompted mainland visitors to HK in droves, one of the biggest factor driving the HK economy back to life following the difficult period in 2003-2004.

The fact that its currency is still pegged to the USD caused enormous pain to HK during the 97-2000 financial crisis in Asia. By holding onto the peg, many industries were priced out and had to close. All other Asian currencies lost about 40%-60% in value, that made the HKD stick out like a sore thumb. Structural unemployment was a big consequence in HK, only high value add industries can survive. However, the peg is also what is helping HK's financial markets NOW. The weak and weaker by the day USD basically cause HK to gain back some competitive edge. The faster the Federal Reserve cuts rates, the more significant will be the positive effects for HK's economy, especially in tourism and property.

It is the only market with the potential for significant capital inflows from Chinese mainland investors. Looking all around Asia, the rich companies and rich individuals are mostly stuck in mainland China, and is likely to see more capital being recycled back into the HK economy over the next 12 months. The HIBOR should go down by 100-150 basis points over the next 6-9 months, which would lead to negative real rates. Historically, such an environment has been a big positive for the economy, property developers, and banks. Also, Hong Kong historically has been the best-performing Asian market during Fed rate cut cycles.

The many new rules and regulations made with respect to QDII and the allowance for individual investors to invest directly into HK listed shares are just indicative of the liquidity and potential liquidity driving the bull. All said, the weak USD has made stocks much cheaper in the US and HK, creating a strong platform for higher equity prices.