FDIC Insures GE Capital's Debt

A follow up to the auto sector and hedge funds write up:

General Electric said Wednesday that the federal government had agreed to insure as much as $139 billion in debt for its lending subsidiary, GE Capital. This is the second time in a month that G.E. has turned to a federal program aimed at helping companies during the global credit crisis.

Until September, GE relied on selling commercial paper to obtain more than 15% of the funding of the finance unit. But investors began shying away from commercial paper after Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection and several other big financial players struggled. GE has said it would reduce its reliance on commercial paper, but it wasn't clear how the company would replace that funding.

GE Capital is not a bank, but granting it access to a new program from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may reassure investors and help the lender compete with banks that already have government-protected debt, a G.E. spokesman, Russell Wilkerson, told Bloomberg News.

“Inclusion in this program will allow us to source our debt competitively with other participating financial institutions,” Mr. Wilkerson said. Joining the program could make it easier for GE to issue new debt in coming months. In recent months, investors have worried about GE's liquidity, and the price it has to pay to borrow money.

The F.D.I.C. program covers about $139 billion of G.E.’s debt, or 125 percent of total senior unsecured debt outstanding as of Sept. 30 and maturing by June 30. GE said Wednesday that under the program, the government will guarantee as much as $139 billion in long- and short-term debt through next June. But, Mr. Wilkerson added, "This does not mean that GE intends to issue this amount of debt."

With roughly $600 billion in assets, GE Capital is as big as some large banks. The finance unit last year supplied almost half of GE's profit. But GE Chairman Jeffrey Immelt this September said he would shrink the unit in response to the credit crisis. GE Capital issues loans for everything from aircraft engines to commercial real estate and restaurant equipment.

G.E.’s finance businesses are able to seek F.D.I.C. debt coverage because its GE Capital subsidiary also owns a federal savings bank and an industrial loan company, both of which already qualify. Last month, G.E. started using a new Federal Reserve program aimed at reviving demand for the commercial paper for a wide variety of companies.

Looks like the Treasury and Fed are making all the right moves and pushing the right buttons so far.

p/s photo: Nancy Wu Ding Yan & Sharon Chan Mun Chi

Phew! CDS, Its Just $33.6 Trillion Not $50 Trillion!!!

Dealbook: In the first of a series of weekly reports, the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation said late Tuesday afternoon that there were a total of $33.6 trillion in credit default swaps outstanding on corporate, government and asset-backed securities. That is less than some earlier estimates of $50 trillion or more.

The company’s data provides a clearer picture of the money bet on the creditworthiness of the world’s companies and governments. The largest dollar amount of credit default swaps were written for protection against the debts of Turkey, Italy, Brazil, Russia and GMAC as of Oct. 31.

Others at the top of the D.T.C.C. list of 1,000 were Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, GE Capital and Countrywide Home Loans. In all those cases, however, the net notional values of the swaps were reduced considerably by hedging.

For example, Turkey was the leader in gross notional credit default swaps, at $188.6 billion, but its net notional exposure after hedging was $7.6 billion.

D.T.C.C.’s figures are available at Deriv/SERV on the D.T.C.C. Web site.

D.T.C.C. said that after this week the data would be shown in two sections. The first section shows the outstanding notional values at a given point in time (the end of each week). Starting next week, the second section will show data relating to the weekly confirmed trade volume, or “turnover,” with respect to the same underlying reference entities and indexes, as well as similar aggregations of such data.

The financial industry is trying to counter lawmakers, regulators and other critics who argue that the lack of transparency in the market for credit default swaps made the financial crisis worse.

“Publishing this data will provide greater transparency in a critical market,” said Tim Ryan, president and chief executive of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, in a statement Tuesday. “This is an important initiative upon which the industry will continue to build.”

The collapse of Lehman Brothers contributed to a sharp drop in financial markets last month because no one knew how many credit default contracts were outstanding on the securities firm. Estimates ranged as high as $400 billion, although the actual amount turned out to be $72 billion, the DTCC said.

Comments: Well, its a very good start. Once you know the figures, its not a guessing game anymore. Then you isolate the top contracts and assess their likelihood of default. As we can see most of the trouble companies have been absorbed by other companies. There is one main danger I see, that is GE Capital, which will work its way back to General Electric. Its still a AAA company but if you were to examine its way of doing business, its a highly leveraged way, and more than 60% of profits are from the 100-200 basis points financing spread that they use to do business with clients, be it funding them or funding the transactions - e.g. consumer loans or even aircrafts (you want to buy an aircraft, let me lend you 90%).

As for country defaults, while its hyped up, only Iceland risk real default and maybe Turkey and Venezuela. The rest have to just tighten their balance sheets, get some billions from IMF and get on with it. Even Russia's demise is not exactly catastrophic, its bad no doubt, but not debilitatingly so.

Just a heads up, I am quite nervous on GE's near term prospects. Its $15 billion capital raising a few weeks back should raise alarm bells. Ratings agencies are again probably too slow to look deeply into how GE's business model is affected by the cascading impact on de-leveraging.

p/s photos: Izumi Mori