Wednesday, April 04, 2018

Trade Wars - Sense & Sensibilities

My view: I like it that China has retaliated tit for tat, because there is no way a trade war will be good for either country. The fact that China did that will actually hasten the "end" to the trade wars quickly. Trump will now have to sit down and negotiate a kinda truce. 

The emerging markets selldown has been way overdone, a kneejerk reaction which has lowered average PE valuations of emerging markets to a 2 year low. I agree with strategists who called this a great opportunity for "all-in" into emerging markets, buying on this dip.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Some of the talking heads on the same issue (as reported by Bloomberg):
Simon Smiles, chief investment officer at UBS Wealth Management for ultra-high net worth clients, said the potential market overreaction gives further reason for money managers to buy into weakness.
“We’re all-in, in terms of the growth impulse, in terms of the relative valuations and that’s against a backdrop of being constructive on risk assets more broadly," he said on Bloomberg TV, adding that UBS is overweight emerging-market equities and hard-currency debt.
Gene Frieda, global strategist at Pacific Investment Management Co.:
  • "The market reaction is confused, reflecting the fact that it has no historical narrative on which to fall back. Today’s Chinese actions were not surprising, but the market response shows how confidence has been diminishing"
  • "You cannot separate tweets against tech firms from tariff actions against China. This is a material change relative to the first quarter, when the market was bulletproof to bad news"
  • Frieda said most probable scenario is a negotiated settlement before the first round of tariffs kick in on both sides. Yet second-most probable is that round one happens with the goods that have now been put on the table
  • China has a strong desire to deescalate the situation
  • Argentina and Brazil could be "unintended beneficiaries" from soybean tariffs
Anders Faergemann, senior fund manager at PineBridge Investments in London:
  • Increased tensions may actually benefit emerging-market assets as markets could dial down their optimistic view of global synchronized growth and ultimately global yields will come down. That would add to the return outlook for spread products such as EM, he said
  • "Valuations have already adjusted sufficiently to compensate for the increased equity volatility and EM spreads are better value now"
  • "As long as China’s retaliation to the U.S. provocation remains within reason, which is our base case, fixed income should benefit and the appeal of EM remains strong and it stands to benefit from investors returning to a 2017 frame of mind"
  • Faergemann favors the Mexican and Colombian pesos in this scenario as markets seem to be overestimating political risk associated with their upcoming elections
Anastasia Levashova, a fund manager at Blackfriars Asset Management in London:
  • A trade war will have a mixed impact on EM countries as China buying less soy, avocados and wine from the U.S. means they’ll buy more from developing nations. On the other hand, no one knows where it will escalate, she said.
  • More important indicator of direct competition between the U.S. and China was the launch of renminbi crude oil futures, a clear trend of strengthening their own currency and trade balance
Kathy Jones, chief fixed-income strategist at Charles Schwab:
  • "It looks like a mixed bag for EM. On the one hand, it could benefit agricultural producers like Brazil and Argentina, but I doubt that is enough to offset the concerns about slowing global growth and protectionism"
Sebastien Barbe, head of emerging-market research and strategy at Credit Agricole CIB
  • "It fuels the risk of a trade war, but we are not there yet. China has intensified its rhetoric, but I think we are still in a hard negotiation”
  • If risks continue to intensify, Asian currencies would probably be most affected as some countries would be hit given supply chains and considering economies are more open to trade than other developing regions
Sean Newman, an Atlanta-based money manager at Invesco Advisers:
  • Although trade war fears should be taken seriously, it isn’t a factor in his long-term outlook for emerging-market assets
  • "We like buying here but are conscious that trade tweets may present some downside risk," noting Trump’s tweets on Monday, where he "hated Nafta in the morning and wanted a deal by the afternoon"
Greg Saichin, chief investment officer for emerging-market bonds at Allianz Global Investors
  • "I still believe this is a negotiating stance for the U.S. -- somewhat justified, somewhat politically driven by the mid-term elections in November. The Chinese understand this"
  • "Up to this point, Mexico was getting all the collateral damage given the negative NAFTA rhetoric. Now I’m not so sure. If this escalates into a full blown trade war then global growth will decrease with negative repercussions for oil and metals"
  • Marginal producers for oil and metals, or competitive producers with high fiscal break-evens will be negatively impacted, he said. Frontier markets such as Ghana, Angola, Mozambique, Zambia and Ecuador, which rely on these commodities as a primary source of foreign-exchange generation, could be particularly hurt.
Alejandro Cuadrado, global head of FX at BBVA in New York:
  • Cuadrado says he doesn’t share investor fears yet and hasn’t altered his long-term outlook for emerging-market currencies.
  • He favors the Colombian and Argentine pesos for their carry





1 comment:

bruno said...

The markets have responded and getting used to the "war mongering" wailings by a sex crazed horndog, named Donald Trump.For his love of pussies of pornstars and playboy models,this horndog would go on his knees and get spanked bare naked.Because of this very weird man,the markets are getting weirder.

The previous week,the markets looked like it was going to the dogs.Only to rallied back to managed to stay out of correction territory.Maybe it was a technical rally as the S&P was at it's long term 200 days MA.Or it was a bull or bear trap.Call it what we want.

Then on Monday,it opened gap down and was down almost five hundred pts only to closed up for the day.The rally started after the the new economic adviser,Larry Kudlow came out to reassured the markets that Trump was all talk and no bite.Till up to Thursday's close,it looks like the US markets was off to the races again.

Then on late Thursday,Stormy Daniels was getting under Trump's skin again.And early Friday, the weird man was off to his twitter tantrums again.The Dow futures was down over 500 pts,rallied near a 100 pts to break even.Larry Kudlow or not,the Dow then plunged down almost 750 pts,but the bulls was not going to give up so easily.With half an hour to go,it rallied above correction territory only to close down 572 pts into correction territory again.

What is very significant about this Friday's close is that once in a long period of time,the Dow has on a daily and weekly close,closed in correction territory.Even if a couple dozen pts only.


The Future For Equity Funds

No Annual Fee Fund By Fidelity The biggest news to come out for a long time for equity funds has to be the announcement By Fidelity Inve...