Skip to main content

London Biscuits - The Only Value Left Is In The Name

Let's look at the demise or downhill run by London Biscuits. We may then be able to see the various permutations involved and announced. How investors should react and so on.


2019 February, London Biscuits’ external auditors Nexia SSY had expressed a qualified opinion on the group’s financial statements for the financial year ended Sept 30, 2018 (FY18). It had raised concern on the group’s physical inventories held at Sept 30, 2018, which were stated in the statements as RM26.89 million at the group level and RM20.79 million at the company level,
(LESSON: any kind of qualified opinion, one should sell first... our professional accountants are loathed to qualify anything unless its really necessary ... sell first then do research later, a lot of time to buy back if you were wrong)

On July 8, London Biscuits slipped into PN17 status after it defaulted on a RM9.8 million in loan payment to Bank of Nova Scotia Bhd,

(July 3), London Biscuits said that its executive director Datuk Ranjeet Singh Sidhu and its chief financial officer Loo Seng Kit had voluntarily resigned. Both had taken on their roles only on June 17,
(LESSON: when top management or board members resign suddenly, another big red flag... this one more so as these two were less than one month into their jobs)

 (July 8), London Biscuits updated in a fresh filing with Bursa Malaysia that it was now a PN17 company due to the payment default,
(LESSON: PN17 generally will yield a shock selldown, PN17 is not all that bad, you have to assess how bad are the books as any potential asset injection or white knight to come in will have to judged on its viability... London Biscuit with just a cursory glance on numbers may require too much debt forgiveness and capital reduction to work for existing shareholders and creditors)

(Aug-Oct) Meileelanusa S/B disposed 5.9%, as of Oct 15 the company has only 7.35% from 13.8% in July,

 (Sept 24): Johor-based confectionery maker London Biscuits Bhd has been slapped with a lawsuit by Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Bhd (KFH) for RM5.06 million in outstanding debt,

(Oct 23), wind up petition and court-appointed PWCoopers Advisory as interim liquidators,

(Nov 12), MembersOne Ventures Fund, a Sydney based fund, has acquired 11.35%,

(Nov 15), in total London Biscuits has defaulted on RM285m

So who would buy now? Who are MembersOne Venture Fund? Only set up in 2017? Those who are cynical may say that the controlling shareholders, having sold at much higher levels, may have a reason to buy now to still "control" future firesale and/or white knight's

emergence. It is well known that most of the machinery in the company needs replacing or upgrading, hence you may even write that asset off altogether. SC needs to be more vigilant here looking at how volatile the changes have been to the company over the past 6 months. Too many things have happened, too many questions have surfaced.

Any value left in the company. The latest quarterly showed a Net Asset per share position of RM1.28. If you multiply by the number of shares 291m = RM372.5m. That is only slightly more than the loans being defaulted of RM285. Naturally net asset value would have already taken into account the loans, hence there should be a lot of vultures buying! But wait, they lose about 30-35 sen each quarter in net asset value. Looking at that trend alone, you would have avoided the stock 6 months ago. Judging on the qualified opinion and swift resignations of new management, one may suspect that the figures may not be reliable at all.

Hence it is prudent to ignore the net asset value altogether, thus the only value left is the brand name London Biscuits. People who buy biscuits are usually not share investors.


Showing sign its moving up....
My target is 29cts in 7 years time or earlier

Popular posts from this blog

6 Countries with the Best Healthcare in the World

Most of us wouldn't know this. We take so many things for granted. Read and weep joyfully. This also bodes well for Thailand and Malaysia to continue to prosper as "tourism healthcare hubs". We are very close with Thailand on a competitive scale with cost being a strong factor for both countries. We win on language skills for sure. Need to see more capital being deployed in this growth sector. 

BEST PLACESBy International Living January 22, 2019
6 Countries with the Best Healthcare in the World

Healthcare is one of the most important factors potential expats consider before moving abroad and in the right places overseas it’s possible to access world-class care for a fraction of the cost back home.

The six countries that take top places in our Global Retirement Index offer retirees first-rate care, the service is top-class–and its affordable.

Measuring the quality of healthcare is difficult, and it’s hard to put a number on it. We can, however, put a number on the price of med…

Ekovest WB and The Market Outlook

Why Such A Big Discount For Ekovest-WB

It will be expiring within a month as shown in the circular. 25 June 2019 to be exact. However, the warrant is trading at a 3-4 sen discount, which is hefty considering there is still the leverage effect. Some might say that there is a negative sentiment prevailing, hence, the discount. Well, yes and no, there are always arbitragers ~ you buy and convert immediately and then sell, better still if you can borrow Ekovest mother share to sell first to lock up the difference for no risk return.

There is usually a few days to one week lag between the conversion and actual crediting of shares. Mind you, the last trading day for the warrants is 7 June and not 25 June. Even so, the discount is a bit much.

Herein lies the difference between beginners and old hands. The savvy ones would know all the prior announcements and would know that there is a 10% share placement underway. The thing is, we do not know when the placement will be done. Once it goes ex-pla…

Drama Minggu Ini - Seacera

Points To Consider:

- Net current assets of Seacera was RM838m, largely backed by its 501 acres of land in Semenyih.
- Current management and CEO proposed to do a jv on that land with Duta Skyline (OCR)
- Datuk William Tan is the single largest shareholder with a 16.4% block and has pledged to inject RM30m into the company to resolve the company's cash flow. Tan basically was against the jv.
- Seacera just defaulted on an RM25,451 payment for its Ambank Islamic loan, putting it into PN17.
- Tan also mentioned that if he manages to take over the company he will declare a 10 sen special dividend after minor asset sales.


- Obviously Tan has other plans to develop the 501 acres, apparently with strong China involvement (Country Garden). So who is to say which jv is better? The CEO has the right to call the shots here.
- However, the CEO and present management totally ignore their largest shareholder's pledge to inject RM30m. How to justify the "silly" missed payment …