Monday, February 27, 2012

Remembering Bukit Merah

Mitsubishi Quietly Cleans Up Its Former Refinery

Rahman Roslan for The New York Times
Lai Kwan prepares to bathe her son, Cheah Kok Leong, who was born with severe mental disabilities. She believes that his condition is related to the radioactive exposure she received while working at the Mitsubishi Chemical’s refinery in Bukit Merah.
BUKIT MERAH, Malaysia — Hidden here in the jungles of north-central Malaysia, in a broad valley fringed with cave-pocked limestone cliffs topped with acacia and durian trees, lies the site of the largest radiation cleanup yet in the rare earth industry.

Residents blamed a rare earth refinery for birth defects and eight leukemia cases within five years in a community of 11,000 — after many years with no leukemia cases. Seven of the leukemia victims have since died.

The Bukit Merah case is little known even elsewhere in Malaysia, and virtually unknown in the West, because Mitsubishi Chemical quietly agreed to fix the problem even without a legal order to do so. Local protesters had contacted Japanese environmentalists and politicians, who in turn helped persuade the image-conscious company to close the refinery in 1992 and subsequently spend an estimated $100 million to clean up the site.
Image-burnishing was important because the company is part of the Mitsubishi Group of Companies, which has long made Malaysia the cornerstone of its southeast Asian operations. The group has dominant positions in manufacturing a range of products, including air-conditioners and cars.
Mitsubishi Chemical also reached an out-of-court settlement with residents here by agreeing to donate $164,000 to the community’s schools, while denying any responsibility for illnesses.
Osamu Shimizu, the director of Asian Rare Earth, the Mitsubishi Chemical subsidiary that owns the mine, declined to discuss details of the factory’s operation before it closed in 1992. But he said that the company was committed to a safe and complete cleanup.
Workers in protective gear have already removed 11,000 truckloads of radioactively contaminated material, hauling away every trace of the old refinery and even tainted soil from beneath it, down to the bedrock as much as 25 feet below, said Anthony Goh, the consultant overseeing the project for one of Mitsubishi’s contractors, GeoSyntec, an Atlanta-based firm.
To dispose of the radioactive material, engineers have cut the top off a hill three miles away in a forest reserve, buried the material inside the hill’s core and then entombed it under more than 20 feet of clay and granite.
The toughest part of the Bukit Merah cleanup will come this summer, when robots and workers in protective gear are to start trying to move more than 80,000 steel barrels of radioactive waste from a concrete bunker. They will mix it with cement and gypsum, and then permanently store it in the hilltop repository.
The refinery processed slag from old tin mines — material rich in rare earth ore. The company and Malaysian regulators said that it was statistically possible that the leukemia cases were a coincidence because tin mining towns tend to have above-average levels of background radiation. But an academic study of another tin mining town suggested that communities of Bukit Merah’s size should only have one leukemia case every 30 years.
Lai Kwan, aged 69, still recalls how she cheerfully moved in the 1980s from a sawmill job to a better-paying position in the refinery that involved proximity to radioactive materials. She remembers that while pregnant, she was told to take an unpaid day off only on days when the factory bosses said that a particularly dangerous consignment of ore had arrived.
She has spent the last 29 years washing, dressing, feeding and otherwise taking care of her son from that pregnancy, who was born with severe mental and physical disabilities. She and other local residents blame the refinery for the problems, although birth defects can have many causes.
“We saw it as a chance to get better pay,” Ms. Lai recalled. “We didn’t know what they were producing.”

15 comments:

William Wang said...

Thank you for reminding your readers on the danger of rare earth processing. One only has to ask this question, if such an industry is so beneficial to it population why on earth would limited countries want to engage in it.

duuude said...

If recent events are any indication, Malaysia still produces people stupid enough to want to import radioactive shit.

ronnie said...

Wonder how far is Sentoria's theme park from the Proposed Lynas plant?

Live Long MU Fan said...

How did the contamination in Bukit Merah happened? If the lessons from this incident is not learned, history will repeat itself again. And it looks like the UMNO government (likely blinded by greed) continues to choose to be ignorant, and such incidents are likely to repeat themselves....

Kingsmen said...

The danger of speculation is even more daunting.

William Wang said...

OMG, Kingsmen, speculation can either make you very rich or bankrupt, nothing like getting yourself or neighbours killed.

wizardteo said...

No science report had show radioactive is related to health issues but example n case studies show it had some related informaly. A radioactive give extra energy which may cause certain dna to evolve abnormal n grow abnormal(i am not a doctor or dna expert) but this is what I think of radioactive to one health(correct me if i wrong). At here if gov do not give way to build this very high risk plant is gov wrong (mean those less risk plant more easily to start here), if gov stop ppl from express their view is gov wrong, if ppl do not express there view is ppl wrong for not love is country enough, if the very high risk plant is reject by the court when ppl applied mean the laws is fair n the ppl is love their country so much that willing to earn less. Just my own views 10q.

wizardteo said...

(I mean the very risk plant get reject after the ppl applied the court to reject the project)The process may unnecesary but the result may good than what we think are).

Boutique Classical Attitude said...

Thanks for sharing. The Bukit Merah case is a good reflections on what may happen to LYNAS.

kamal said...

The main problem with Lynas is they unable / did not disclose how the wastage will be handle / dispose in their report which is the paramount important and will endanger the surrounding beings.

my source "Sahabat Alam Malaysia"

kamal said...

The main problem with Lynas is they unable / did not disclose how the wastage will be handle / dispose in their report which is the paramount important and will endanger the surrounding beings.

my source "Sahabat Alam Malaysia"

MP said...

... wizardteo, you said ..."The process may unnecesary but the result may good than what we think are"

I have read both your comments 10 times but I still cannot understand what you are saying. The most intelligible thing you said is what I quoted above.

If you think Lynas is right or is a good project for this country, then I suggest you apply for a position with the ruling govt. to be their chief spinwizard. Your wizardry with the english language will be much appreciated by them.

Angry bird said...

Only nuts will believe,those radiaactive shit will be sent back to Australia,thousand miles away,why were they here in the first place.That spokesman relly has brains of a pig, to sell such crap to us''.

Angry bird said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
wizardteo said...

1) I am using broken english, I don't care u understood or not but I just express my thoughts.
2) I did think of applied working at there but some people may cause petty problem that would make me feel guilty mind, I don't mind I take the hard work or be the fool etc but this is the things I trying to avoid.
3) Some people may not undersatand that different between a nuke plant and refinery plant. With better technology and management to handle critical situation situation can be much different.
4) I want the refinery to build but at the same time zero or near zero ecosystem damage.
4a)benefit from the 500 employment, the tax? too directly or too tiny can I said that?
5)Where is the people that bring the thing in? Why no respond from them?
6) An easy solution is do not bring the thing at the start or/and just stop the process from the higher commander but I would choose the harder solution to build and to protect the ecosystem.
7) I more care about the ecosystem damaging than the current radiation reading. Remember some state water come from here, if the damaged the water they will also bear it or if it poluted the sea, how big or the cause to the beach etc?
8)Add another year free tax as a compesantion for the plant and the term is the plant offer self strict regulation to protect ecosystem or the authorised will offer strict regulations.
9) On Sunday morning, I and my family went to public playground, at there I see many happy face, some may tired but still happy, if this become wasteland where can I see more happy face
10) My policy remain the same 1)for the people, 2)for the future 3)for love, if harmful to human how good can it be, if damage to the enironment where is the future, when nothings left, where to find the love?